social enterprise blog

FCRA Amendments: a blessing in disguise for Social Enterprises and Social Startups?

Social Enterprises and Social Startups are traditionally not the first options for International Philanthropy when they are looking to deploy their considerable resource to make Social Impact and help achieve UN Sustainable Development Goals [SDGs]. This is due to multiple reasons like trust, old habits, existing legal and operational structures, establish channels and relationships etc. all of which favors International Philanthropy relation with local Non-profits and philanthropy. However recent changes the law governing this relationship in India, has opened a possibility even necessity for International Philanthropy to restructure their existing relationship and explore new methods and relationship. This creates a window of opportunity for Social Enterprises and Social Startups to seek support from International Philanthropy to help achieve their vision.

This article will explore the recent changes in brief and how and why it creates opportunities for Social Enterprises and Social Startups. It also layout the fact the same hurdles mentioned above and can also create hinder this process. This highlights the need to reimagine the social impact sector to meet this new challenge.

The Change is coming:

New FCRA amendments which were introduced and passed in the Parliament without advance notice, have caused an uproar in the Non-Profit sector. These new amendments have variously been called, ‘Surgical Strike on India’s Voluntary Sector’, ‘Fatal blow to civil society work’ among other things. And they have led to real-life consequences like shutting down of Amnesty International India’s Operations leading to loss of jobs for 150 persons.[i] There is also a lot of uncertainty regarding proposed changes in International Philanthropy focused on India.[ii]
Yet they may also lead to an unintended consequence of giving a boost to Social Enterprises and Social Startups in India. Let’s examine in details the implications.

What is FCRA?

Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) is a law that regulates and in certain cases prohibits receiving of “foreign contribution or foreign hospitality by certain individuals or associations or companies”.[iii] It is designed to regulate Foreign contribution to Individuals and Non-profits and is the counterpart to acts like the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) which regulate foreign investment in the for-profit sector.[iv]

Introduced first time at height of Emergency in 1976 and strengthened in 2010, the act viewed by many as draconian and xenophobic seeks to address the Government’s concern that Non-Profit sectors may act as a conduit for money to flow to India from a source that is antithetical to countries interests.[v] Hence it prohibits certain person like Elected officials from receiving any foreign contribution and regulates for what purpose and in what manner Non-profits can receive foreign contribution and who can they utilize it.

What are the new changes?

In the new amendment passed in September 2020, Government made further changes in relation to a prohibited person and the more important manner is which foreign contribution can be utilized. This includes among other things:

  • Changing the definition of a prohibited person from Government Servant to Public servants.
  • Reducing the amount used on administrative expensed from 50% to 20% of foreign contributions,
  • Prohibiting Sub granting
  • Mandating all FCRA accounts be opened in one branch of SBI in Delhi.[vi]

While the reasons and merits of these changes have been debated elsewhere, it is widely recognized that these will have a major impact on the Social Impact and Non-profit sector in India. Also while full implication will be known only once the Rules of acts are published, many existing models of Social Impact sectors seems to have been rendered in operational. It also makes functioning more onerous for both funders and recipients.

Are Social Enterprises and Social Startups the way out?

There is justified apprehension that in the worst-case scenario there will be a reduction in and diversion of international philanthropy away from India. It would gravely affect the most marginalization sections in the Country and have a negative consequence on the country meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Hence there is a need to reimagine how International philanthropy works in India and how at least a section of Impact sectors activities can be preserved under these conditions. The solution can be Social Enterprises and Social Startups.

Social Enterprises or social business are generally described as For-profit entity which works to achieve social impact in a sustainable manner.[vii] While in India they don’t exist as a separate legal entity, unlike in some other country, they are seen by many as an alternative model to achieve social impact in some areas. Social Startups can be seen described as Social Enterprises which aim to make an impact in a scalable manner.

So why are Social Enterprises a way out? Well FCRA has a certain exemption in terms of regulation and prohibition of foreign contribution. Most prominently any For-profit work done on behalf of a Foreign entity is not covered under FCRA.

Section 4 of FCRA clearly defines the persons on whom prohibition of the act don’t apply and states,

“Nothing contained in section 3 shall apply to the acceptance, by any person specified in that section, of any foreign contribution where such contribution is accepted by him, subject to the provisions of section 10,-

(a) by way of salary, wages or other remuneration due to him or to any group of persons working under him, from any foreign source or by way of payment in the ordinary course of business transacted in India by such foreign source; or

(b) by way of payment, in the course of international trade or commerce, or in the ordinary course of business transacted by him outside India; or…”[viii]

As mentioned earlier the aim of FCRA was to regulated foreign contribution i.e. grants, donations etc received by Nonprofit Sectors. As Social Enterprises are by definition For Profit entity which seeks contract and payments for work done and not grants,  they are not covered under restrictions and prohibition of FCRA. They will be covered by other laws like FEMA but these are in most cases less onerous and more importantly, have clearer and well-established interpretation. This reduces the regulatory and legal risk associated with them.

What would this new model look like?

Thus, in this new scenario Social Enterprises and Social Startups, International Philanthropy instead of issuing a call for grants to achieve certain objectives, will issue a request for tender [RFT]. Social Enterprises and Social Startups can apply for this and get a contract that sets outs objective and timeline. This, of course, would mean a change in the approach, but other objective would be met.

To illustrate:

 An International Philanthropy organization wants to combat anemia in India. They would issue RFT with the objective set out. Social Enterprises and Social Startups then can as individual or consortium apply for the RFT. Lets as XYZ is Social Enterprises that make fortified biscuits and ABC is a Social Startups that has invented a new technology to mass screen for anemia is a very cheap way. Together they can apply the contract setting out the parameters of the project and the cost involved.

Such a contract with Third-Party Beneficiary i.e. person benefiting from the contract is not one paying the fees are perfectly valid under the law. In fact, they create an additional safeguard as under this arrangement event the Third-Party Beneficiary has the right to sue the service provider for deficiency in the service.

This of course is thus a simple illustration. There are many other models possible. Also, the For-Profit model allows for far more experimentation and innovation as For-Profit entity face far less regulatory burden to justify the decision making and can also hire professionals more easily.

What are the hurdles?

Of course, it is not all hunky-dory. There are certain hurdles needed to overcome before Social Enterprises can become a viable option for India Focused International Philanthropy. Some of the important ones are:

  • Funding Models: Funder organization made need to make fundamental changes in their operational and even legal model to be able to give contracts to Social Enterprises. The present model including reporting and legal structure is designed to give grants to Nonprofits and not contract to For-profits. There may be even a legal prohibition on such a contract. All these need to be worked out.
  • Cost structure also needs to look into taking into consideration the taxation and compensation requirement that comes with For-Profits entities.
  • Trust: Most Social Enterprises are a relatively new player and entire ecosystems need to develop trust in relation to both individual motive and viability to the model to make an impact in a sustainable and cost-effective manner.

There are other issues that may also arise with more experimentation with this model.


However Social Enterprise model also brings potential benefits. This include:

  • Fair compensation to employees in Social Sectors
  • Potential scalability of a successful model.
  • Potential Sustainability of the model.
  • More Accountability


It is said that necessity is the mother of invention. The adverse condition in the social sector created by these FCRA changes means that all actors will have to pivot and take innovative steps to survive. Using the For-Profit Social Enterprise and Social Startup model is one-way Social Impact sectors can adapt to the environment created by the new FCRA law and thrive. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, in her budget, highlighted the need for a market-based approach for Social Sector.[ix]  Social Enterprise and Social Startup can use this new adversity to create a new opportunity for themselves and make a sustainable social impact.

[i] Dadrawala, Noshir  H. “The Government Has Conducted a Surgical Strike on India’s Voluntary Sector.” The Wire, 12 Oct. 2020, , Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020; Khan, Fatima, et al. “Modi Govt Tables FCRA Amendments, Opposition & NGOs Call It Fatal Blow to Civil Society Work.” ThePrint, 20 Sept. 2020, , Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020; Shantha, Sukanya. “Amnesty International India Shuts Down, Blames Government’s ‘Reprisal’.” The Wire, 29 Sept. 2020,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[ii] “New Indian FCRA Amendments Impact Foreign Grants to Indian NGOs.” Council on Foundations, 13 Oct. 2020,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[iii] ResponsiveWebInc. “Bare Acts Live.” Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[iv]Ibid; ClearTax. “Foreign Exchange Management Act – FEMA.” Pinchy, ClearTax, 5 June 2020,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[v] Team, The Print, et al. “UPA Made Indira’s Draconian FCRA Tougher, Modi Govt’s Amendments Will Now Make It Worse.” ThePrint, 21 Sept. 2020,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[vi] The Gazette of India. “THE FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) AMENDMENT ACT, 2020.” FCRA Online Services , Ministry of Law and Justice , 28 Sept. 2020,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[vii] Barone, Adam. “The Aims of Social Enterprises.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 29 Aug. 2020,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[viii] ResponsiveWebInc. “Bare Acts Live.” Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.
[ix] Roy, Divyanshu Dutta. “Nirmala Sitharaman’s Budget Proposes Creating A ‘Social Stock Exchange.’”, NDTV, 5 July 2019,, Accessed on 20 Oct. 2020.

Social Impact - Pitch Competition Pune